<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine?</title>
        <link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/topic/443/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ My birthday is coming up in a few weeks and birthdays are as good of an excuse as any to get a new rod.


I&#39;m looking at a few different rods, but i&#39;m leaning toward the 6&#39; 2wt Full Flex 3.0 Orvis Superfine Trout Bum.  Has anyone fished this rod (or
maybe even just cast it)?  I saw one report on the internet where a guy tried it out.  He said he was using 3wt line to get this shorter rod to load properly. 
I&#39;m wondering if this little rod will load up with 2wt line for short... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:31:53 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4112/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4112</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ They are amazing! Certainly, they are limited due to the inherent weight, however, for what they do, they are amazing! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flyflingerandy1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4112</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4073/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4073</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sean,
<br>
Glass, well it&#39;s sweet soft and slow. I&#39;ll be sure and bring my 6&#39;6&quot; Lami for you to try; from it you&#39;ll have an idea of the feel of most
glass rods.
<br>
Les ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (keebranch)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4073</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4072/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4072</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Keebranch, hopefully we will get an opportunity to fish together soon, and I&#39;ll be sure to bring my dorber 5&#39; 2wt.
<br>
<br>
All of this talk about fiberglass makes me curious. What&#39;s the fascination with glass? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (swalker9513)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4072</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:51:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4071/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4071</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I appreciate everyones help and input.
<br>
<br>
i&#39;m definitely going to do some checking on those glass rods.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jds)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4071</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:16:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4065/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">cross creek one wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  JDS, so long as you&#39;re looking at rods in that price range, you might take a look at Scott Fibertouch rods, the new Hardy Glass rods (cheaper by a good
  measure), Steffen Bros. glass rods, and McFarland glass rods (willing to wait a year or so?). In a really short rod, glass just seems to communicate better
  than graphite (notice I didn&#39;t say cast better--I&#39;ll leave that up to the fisherman to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jkurtz7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4065</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:09:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4062/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ JDS, so long as you&#39;re looking at rods in that price range, you might take a look at Scott Fibertouch rods, the new Hardy Glass rods (cheaper by a good
measure), Steffen Bros. glass rods, and McFarland glass rods (willing to wait a year or so?). In a really short rod, glass just seems to communicate better
than graphite (notice I didn&#39;t say cast better--I&#39;ll leave that up to the fisherman to decide). It&#39;s also tougher, which may be an advantage with
the thin tips required for... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cross creek one)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4062</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4047/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4047</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Cross Creek one,
<br>
What you&#39;re describing sounds very much like my TFO 6&#39; 2wt. Too fast for 2wt line in short distance but great with 4WF in distances up to 35 feet.
<br>
I would love to handle a short true 2wt.
<br>
<br>
Les ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (keebranch)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4047</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:15:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4042/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If you&#39;re looking for a short 2wt, keep looking, unless you have a really fast stroke. I had the 602/4 One Ounce, but ended up selling it. It&#39;s a
terrific (sweet) 4wt and not a bad 3wt if you like to cast a short rod fairly long, but a 2wt line won&#39;t load it until you get 25-30 ft of line out, and
even then, it&#39;s pretty fast. Of course, you should cast it yourself to see if you like it. On the plus side, it breaks down into the smallest, lightest
package I&#39;ve ever seen, if... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cross creek one)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4042</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4037/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4037</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, the difference in line weights is negligible, but in my mind, they are all 1wts. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flyflingerandy1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4037</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:32:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4036/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4036</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ i&#39;ve been considering that too.  i actually have a spool of 00 Quiet Taper line laying around. 
<br>
<br>
is there an advantage to the 00 over the 000?  My only reasoning so far is that i should go ahead and go for the lightest TXL.  <img title="happy" src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/happy.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jds)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4036</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:23:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4034/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4034</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I would pick up the TXL 00. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flyflingerandy1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4034</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:19:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4032/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4032</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ thanks for the reply J.
<br>
<br>
I go back and forth on whether i want a shorter rod for my home waters, or one of Sage&#39;s 00 or 000 TXL to challenge the small fish i usually target.
I&#39;m loving the 1wt, but i see situations where i could go just a little lighter. : )
<br>
<br>
On the on the hand, i just have this soft spot for the Superfine series and i love short rods in general. : )
<br>
<br>
i&#39;m hoping to make it over to Sevierville TN pretty soon and hopefully i can do some... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jds)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4032</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/reply/4029/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html#reply-4029</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I can&#39;t remember if I played with that Superfine 602 or not. I&#39;ve messed with most of them though at the local Orvis dealer. I&#39;d say that the rod
would be just fine with a 2wt line, and I know that it gets good reviews on the Orvis website. The one that would probably need a 3wt line to load better would
be the new Helios Ion 602.
<br>
It is a mid-flex 7.5 so it is a bit stiffer than the Superfine rods.
<br>
<br>
J. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jkurtz7)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/sreply/4029</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Any opinions on the 602-4 Superfine? ]]></title>
			<link>http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/topic/443/t/Any-opinions-on-the-602-4-Superfine-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My birthday is coming up in a few weeks and birthdays are as good of an excuse as any to get a new rod.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m looking at a few different rods, but i&#39;m leaning toward the 6&#39; 2wt Full Flex 3.0 Orvis Superfine Trout Bum.  Has anyone fished this rod (or
maybe even just cast it)?  I saw one report on the internet where a guy tried it out.  He said he was using 3wt line to get this shorter rod to load properly. 
I&#39;m wondering if this little rod will load up with 2wt line for... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jds)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://ultralightflyfishing.yuku.com/topic/443</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>